Objections to Believing the Bible Like Jesus Believed It (and Answers ) Cont

• Objection 4 Maybe the views expressed are Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John's views not Jesus' views. (Answer: So maybe 'All Scripture is NOT inspired,' … infidel!)

• Objection 5 Since inerrancy is claimed only for the autographs (original signed, autographed manuscripts) and none of these is available to us now, inerrancy is a moot question. (Answer: Maybe God preserved EVERY WORD of HIS BOOK like he promised! Divisive Diabolical Infidels!)

• Virkler, holding to the theory that God was unable to preserve Scripture but genius scholars will reconstruct it for Him with the Alexandrian manuscripts that they value so highly! (scripts that Origen, Jerome and Saint Augustine twiddled with!), provides this lame answer (again) “The variant readings about which any doubt remains among textual critics of the New Testament affect no material question of historic fact of of Christian faith and practice.” and “The question of the authority and veracity of the biblical texts as we have them today should be decided on bases other than the fact that we do not possess the autographs.” Lame, Henry A. Virkler, very lame! What did Jesus believe again? In original manuscripts? What did God call “All Scripture” in 2Tim 3:16? Original manuscripts? Very Very Lame, Henry.